Mock Test report — on one page

The top of the report: Score 183 out of 300, 67 of 75 answered, 75% accuracy, 171 of 180 min used, +200 from 50 right answers (×4) and −17 from 17 wrong ones. One line sums it up: Chemistry is the strongest subject (68/100) and the most marks are waiting in Physics. Below it, What this attempt shows: he tried 89% of the paper and got 75% of those right — so the next marks come from choosing which questions to answer, not from more knowledge.

Your score and where it came from: what right answers earned and what wrong ones cost. “Only your own numbers — no ranks, no comparisons”: the report is about you, not about a crowd.

The whole result in a few numbers, in the same marking the real exam uses. There is no rank and no comparison with other children — it describes your child's paper and nothing else.

Score, attempt rate, accuracy and the cost of negative marking for one sitting, followed by a plain-language reading of what the numbers mean — the same tiles for every student in a batch.

Each subject marked out of 100 with a band — Maths 61, Physics 54, Chemistry 68, all Developing — and a table of right, wrong, left blank and not opened for each. Physics has the most unanswered (3 blank, 1 not opened). Below, the Section breakdown splits Section A (single correct) from Section B (numerical): Chemistry earned 63 marks in Section A but only 5 in Section B.

Bands use one rule everywhere: Strong 70% and above, Developing 45–69%, Needs work below 45% of the marks available in this test. The section table shows whether numericals are costing you.

A fair view of the three subjects side by side. The colour is the share of marks earned in that subject on this paper — not a judgement of ability.

Subject balance with right / wrong / blank / not opened split out, and a Section A / B split — the numerical section is often where a strong subject leaks marks.

Time per subject — Maths 61 min, Physics 55 min, Chemistry 51 min — and how it split: 125 min on right answers, 30 min on wrong answers, 11 min on questions finally left blank. Then how many answers came in each half hour: a steady 5–12 right answers in every half hour, through to submitting at 171 minutes.

Time is the quiet lever. Eleven minutes went on questions that earned nothing; the half-hour bars show whether you kept a steady pace.

Shows whether the paper was rushed or used well. This sample used almost the full three hours at an even pace — a good habit.

A pacing profile per student: half-hour buckets show when answers were given; the right / wrong / blank split shows where the minutes paid off.

Every question sorted into one group by its result and the time taken against its guide time: 17 right within guide time, 33 right but took longer, 5 wrong answered quickly (all in Maths), 12 wrong after some thought (6 in Physics), 4 time spent, left blank, 4 not opened. Each group links to its worked solutions.

The groups separate “I don't know this” from “I rushed this”. Thirty-three right answers took longer than the guide time — you know them; now practise for speed. Twelve wrong after some thought point to concept gaps.

This is the most useful part to talk about: not how many were wrong, but how they went wrong — and each kind needs a different fix.

Behaviour, not just accuracy: the same wrong answer means different things depending on the time spent. Use the group links to review only one group with a student.

Right out of asked at each level: Easy 17/21 (81%), Moderate 27/40 (68%), Tough 6/14 (43%), with a note — 4 Easy questions missed, worth up to 18 marks. Tabs show the same for Maths, Physics and Chemistry.

Marks are won first on Easy and Moderate questions. The four missed Easy questions are worth up to 18 marks — usually the quickest marks to win back.

A simple check of priorities: are the easier questions being secured before the hard ones are attempted?

Difficulty-tier accuracy per student, with the Easy-question loss counted in marks — a concrete number to coach against.

Chapters with 3 or more questions, weakest first, each with a band and a Practise → link: Optics 1 of 3 right and Integral Calculus 2 of 4 — Needs work; Kinematics and Coordinate Geometry — Developing. The other 47 chapters had only 1–2 questions each and are listed as too few to judge. Below, the kind of thinking asked: Understand an idea 10/10, Apply a method 29/50, Analyse a new situation 11/15 — “Apply a method” is where most marks slipped.

A mock touches each chapter only a few times, so a chapter gets a band only with 3 or more questions. Your lasting chapter colour on My Assessments comes from your last 3 Chapter Tests of it.

Where practice should go next, by chapter — with an honest note where the paper had too few questions to judge.

Chapter evidence from one sitting, with a clear limit (3+ questions). “Kind of thinking asked” shows whether marks slip on applying a method or on new situations.

Simple arithmetic on this paper — not a prediction: score 183; leaving the 5 quick wrong answers blank → 188 (+5); leaving all 17 wrong answers blank → 200 (+17); getting the 4 missed Easy questions right → 201 (+18). The rows overlap, so they are not added up.

It turns advice into marks. Here, securing the Easy questions and dropping doubtful guesses are each worth about 17–18 marks.

A calm, factual way to see which change would help most — without promising a score.

A ready coaching conversation: which single habit moves this student the furthest.

A timeline of when each answer was last changed: Maths first (24 answers, minutes 1–62), then Physics (21 answers, 62–112), then Chemistry (22 answers, 116–168), submitted at 171 min. Four questions were still marked for review at submit.

Shows your route through the paper. Here the strongest subject, Chemistry, came last — starting with it could bank its marks before tiredness sets in.

Shows whether the paper was approached with a plan.

Paper strategy at a glance; best read on a laptop or tablet.

The question map with All 75 selected: every question by subject and type — ✓ right, ✗ wrong, grey box left blank, dashed box not opened, orange top took longer than the guide time, 🔖 marked for review. Filters: Wrong (17), Left blank (4), Not opened (4), Took longer (38), Marked for review (4), and each subject. Tapping a number opens that question with its options and full worked solution.

Tap any number to open its worked solution. Pick a filter first — for example only Wrong — and Next steps through just those.

The whole paper on one screen: green ticks, red crosses and empty boxes make the pattern obvious at a glance.

Item-level evidence for a one-to-one review; filters make it quick to go through only what matters.

Three concrete steps chosen from this paper: 1 · Practise Optics (Physics) — 1 of 3 right, with Start the Chapter Test →; 2 · You spent 11 min on 4 questions you then left blank — skip sooner and come back; 3 · Read the worked solutions of your 12 “wrong after some thought” questions first, with Read them now →.

Short, specific and doable. Do the first one this week.

The plan in plain words — the easiest way to help is to ask which step has been done.

Per-student next actions you can assign or follow up.

Every question in one table — chapter and key concept, difficulty, kind of thinking, guide time, time spent, result and group — with Worked solution → on each row. It shares the same filter as Every question.

Use it to scan, sort and pick — then open a worked solution from any row.

The detailed view, for when you want everything in one place.

The full item table for a student — the fastest place to spot patterns by chapter or difficulty.